Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion top post
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Walter Roberson  
View profile  
 More options Aug 14 2007, 12:12 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
From: rober...@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter Roberson)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 04:12:40 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Aug 14 2007 12:12 am
Subject: Re: top post
In article <pan.2007.08.13.12.49...@irq.org>,
Ivar Rosquist  <IRosqu...@irq.org> wrote:

>    I agree with your views on this. What I don't like are the self-
>appointed network policemen, whose kneejerk reaction is just to condemn
>top posting, without qualifications, as though top-posting were something
>intrinsically evil.

Top-posting is inherently *selfish* -- it assumes that people are
focused on that particular thread and have seen and remembered
what has gone before. It might be fine for people who only read
the occasional posting, but it is unworkable for busy people
with many different things to track, especially for busy people who
read hundreds of messages a day.

I've been hitting over 5000 threads per day lately: if -you- had
listened to 5000 different conversations today, and another 5000
tomorrow, and two days from now someone went ahead and continued one of
the conversations as if there hadn't been any interruption, would -you-
be able to pick up immediately, or would you have to say, "Hold on!
Give me the background context to this before you start in on the
continuation!" ?

What kind of people read hundreds or thousands of messages a day
(and understand them)? Oddly enough, such people tend to be the
people with a lot of experience -- exactly the kind of person you
hope might answer questions or provide a clarification/correction
if one is necessary. So if you hope that the experienced posters
will contribute to a thread if warranted, then you should make it
easy for them to do so -- by *not* top-posting!

--
   I was very young in those days, but I was also rather dim.
   -- Christopher Priest


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google